Culling the Herd… Whats Left?

MODS:
Footoon Hades V2 26650 and matched Cerberus 28.5mm RDA + 18650 battery sleeve adapter $99
TimesVape Dreamer + Ardent 27mm RDA matched Set $90

RDA:
Damn Vape Intense Mesh MTL 24mm RDA $12
Vulcan 22mm RDA $15
Tendou Nobunaga 22mm RDA (2-SS) (1-Black) $10 each
Tendou Shingen 22mm RDA (2-SS) (2-Black) $15 each
Praxis Derringer 22mm RDA’s New (5) $50 each
Vaponaute Le Magister 22mm RDA clone $15
Wismec Neutron SS 25mm RDA $10
QP Design Kong 28mm RDA Master Kit $50

SUB OHM COIL TANKS:
Uwell Crowns:
Black 22mm New with coils $17
SS 22mm Used extra glass tank $12
Crown IV 24mm SS Used extra glass tank $20

RTA:
Atmizoo Tripod 22mm RTA $90
Alba/Siam Ti Cobra Genesis 20mm x 63mm RTA + spare glass tank $90

Items will come in original packaging with all of their accessories and paperwork.
Items are used and in 8-9/10 condition.
See photos as what you see is what you get.

Shipping: USPS Priority Mail or USPS Ground Advantage. (usually around $8-10)

Payment: PP F&F or the Cash App.
Please use “electronic parts” or similar as a description only. 
No mention of anything vape related please.

Need more pics? Let me know.

Take The Survey!

Since 2016 CASAA has been working cooperatively with ECigIntelligence, an independent information service focused on tracking regulatory change and market intelligence for the vape sector. CASAA assists them with their annual U.S. survey of adults who vape by helping them develop survey questions that aid us in our advocacy efforts and help take the pulse of the vaping community.

As we do every year, CASAA is asking our members to participate in this year’s survey!

Take the Survey!

WHY SHOULD YOU PARTICIPATE?
The data collected from this survey will help inform regulators, advocates, and commentators as we all work to build policies that benefit consumers. The FDA in particular subscribes to this dataset and it can therefore serve as direct feedback on how their policies benefit or harm people who vape.

WHAT KIND OF QUESTIONS WILL YOU BE ASKED?
The survey takes about 10-15 minutes to complete, and will ask you a range of questions starting with general demographic information like your age, gender, race, what state you live in, and your household income. Only a few of these demographic questions are required, however, so you can skip any you’d prefer not to disclose. After that you’ll answer a range of questions about your history of tobacco and vapor product use. The survey is anonymous, and none of the information provided can or will be used to personally identify you. You have the option of supplying your email at the end of the survey if you’d like to receive a summary of the results.

WHO CAN PARTICIPATE IN THE SURVEY?
Adults over the age of 21 living in the United States who currently use or previously used vapor and tobacco products are encouraged to participate.

HOW ELSE CAN YOU HELP?
After you’ve completed the survey, or if you are disqualified from participating but still want to help, please encourage your friends and family to participate! The goal of the survey is 5,000 respondents minimum, so every person helps!

Take the Survey!

Thank you for standing up for tobacco harm reduction,

Alex Clark
CEO, CASAA

New Mexico Anti-nicotine services disrupted as funding dries up

This Issue underscores shortcomings in how NM pays for its efforts.

BY DAN MCKAY JOURNAL CAPITOL BUREAU SANTA FE — Quitting is never easy.

But New Mexicans planning to give up tobacco or nicotine may have more trouble finding help this summer.

The state’s contract for the 1-800-QUIT-NOW line ended June 30, and it wasn’t accepting new clients this month.

Earlier this year the state Department of Health abruptly canceled about $741,000 in funding to groups that help people quit smoking — or never start — after revenue from a settlement fund failed to reach expectations.

The disruption in funding underscores long standing shortcomings in how New Mexico pays for much of its anti-nicotine efforts.

Legal settlements with tobacco companies provide funding. But the state has failed to grow an endowment like permanent fund as planned, leaving New Mexico with a less-stable funding stream for nicotine prevention.

This year’s cuts are drawing renewed attention from legislators who say the explosion in vaping among young people makes it all the more important to spend on prevention.

“It’s absolutely critical these programs have continuity,” state Rep. Joanne Ferrary, D-Las Cruces, said in an interview.

State health officials say they are doing the best they can amid a shortfall in New Mexico’s tobacco settlement funds.

Jodi McGinnis Porter, a spokeswoman for the Department of Health, said the state made it a priority to maintain the most essential services for nicotine addiction treatment when the funding came in below projections.

But she acknowledged the state’s Nicotine Use Prevention and Control Program suspended some services — largely marketing and education, she said — to handle the $741,000 reduction in funding.

The department “is looking for other funding sources to support NUPAC in the future,” McGinnis Porter said. ‘Disheartening’

Alex Ross-Reed, executive director of the Health Equity Alliance for LGBTQ+ New Mexicans, or HEAL Plus NM, described the budget cut as “shocking.”

After 20 years of state funding, her organization received an email May 3 directing her to stop work on anti-tobacco services.

“It’s brutal for our organization,” Ross-Reed said in an interview.

Nicotine prevention funding had made up 60% of the organization’s operating budget, she said, helping to fund a directory of behavioral health care providers who are LGBTQ-friendly and other efforts to help people quit tobacco.

The order to stop work, she said, came after HEAL Plus NM had ordered $5,000 in supplies. The organization, she added, wasn’t reimbursed.

Laurel McCloskey, executive director of the Chronic Disease Prevention Council, said her group postponed its annual tobacco policy summit after its state funding was halted.

The disruption in revenue makes it more difficult, she said, for anti-tobacco groups to sustain their work.

“It’s just super disheartening,” McCloskey said.

Her organization, she said, had received state funding for eight years before it was pulled this year.

Funding trouble

The tobacco funding shortfall comes as New Mexico enjoys an oil-and gas revenue boom that has pushed government spending to a record high.

But most of New Mexico’s tobacco cessation programs are funded through a distinct source: settlements reached with big tobacco companies.

In 2000, the state created a tobacco settlement permanent fund as part of the legal agreements. It was intended to be an endowment- like fund that could make annual distributions to pay for tobacco cessation, treatment and similar programs in New Mexico.

At first, about half the annual settlement cash from the tobacco companies went into the permanent fund, and the other half was put to use immediately on health and treatment programs — a balance between covering immediate needs and building a sustainable funding source for future services.

But it hasn’t worked as planned. Amid a budget crunch after the Great Recession, the state turned to the tobacco permanent fund to help bolster its financial bottomline.

Since 2008, the annual payments from tobacco companies have often been spent on services rather than growing the permanent fund.

It’s left the state with a more volatile source of revenue for tobacco cessation programs than if the permanent fund had been allowed to grow and generate predictable income.

Lawmakers pushed to address the problems this year with legislation, Senate Bill 178, that would have moved the tobacco permanent fund out of the state’s general fund reserves.

It would have allowed the $310 million or so now in the permanent fund to be invested more effectively, supporters say, and helped protect it from being used to cover shortfalls in other operations.

The bill won bipartisan approval in both chambers of the Legislature.

But Democratic Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham vetoed the legislation without explanation. She didn’t sign it before a constitutional deadline, blocking it from becoming law, a procedure known as a pocket veto.

Rejection of the bill prevented the transfer of about $58 million into the tobacco settlement fund. Budget legislation delivering the injection of funding was contingent on the approval of Senate Bill 178.

A member of the Lujan Grisham administration said the governor didn’t act on the bill, in part, because she wanted more time to evaluate it. The effective date of the legislation was set for July 1 next year, so there’s still time to adopt the bill next year and have it go into effect on the original schedule, the administration official said.

Sen. Martin Hickey, an Albuquerque Democrat who sponsored the bill, said he intends to reintroduce the measure and seek Lujan Grisham’s support.

As a physician, Hickey said, he understands firsthand the value of programs that help people avoid addiction in the first place. Early nicotine use, for example, can prime the brain’s pathways for addiction, he said, underscoring the importance of prevention efforts.

“How often do you have an opportunity to nip that (health issue) in the bud?” he said in an interview.

As it stands now, the American Lung Association gave New Mexico an “F” for funding of tobacco prevention and cessation services. Funding was about 30% of the CDC-recommended level, the association said in a 2023 report.

Preventable death

Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking is a risk factor for cancer, heart disease, stroke and other problems.

The federal government also describes vaping as unsafe for teens and young adults. Nicotine is addictive and can harm brain development, according to the CDC.

The use of electronic cigarettes, however, is on the rise among students. About 34% of high school students in New Mexico reported using e-cigarettes in 2019, a 10 point increase over a five-year period, according to state data.

Outlook

Lawmakers are preparing to question New Mexico’s top health and finance officials about the funding cut.

Rep. Ferrary, chairwoman of the Legislature’s Tobacco Settlement Revenue Oversight Committee, said the panel has scheduled a public hearing in September to ask about the issue.

For Ross-Reed at Heal Plus NM, the budget cut exacerbates what she already sees as a lopsided fight: The cash available to organizations like hers, she said, is tiny compared to the resources available to tobacco companies offering an addictive product.

“I feel like these budget cuts and these decisions,” Ross-Reed said, “have just cut the legs out of what was already hard to do.”

Drip Tips Week Two

Well it’s week two, actually week three but who’s counting? So I found a few more pics from prior advertising I kept from my retail store days of some more special product from Cherry Vape.

Anyway, here are three more from the new collection since I missed last weeks post.

The first tip is a lovely putty color base with a swirling mixture of hot yellow and a mixture of pink and teal. You really can’t see these little variations from a distance except close up. The second one is a bright iridescent green with small grey stripes and what appears to be pink hearts kind of like xmas meets valentines day combined. The third one simply looks like beautiful turquoise stone.

Drip Tips Week One

First, a bit of history. An avid collector of drip tips I am. A few weeks ago I came upon an unbelievable ad on ECF. An older collection of hand turned drip tips turned up. Made by a mysterious fellow named Brett, the owner of a company called Bull Box Mods circa 2014. I had to buy them.

Each week I will showcase with a pic each and every one of 35 tips that I have acquired as I think these are some of the most beautiful tips I have seen in a long time. I have always been a fan of the venerable “Ming” style tips and these are truly outstanding. The first Ming tips I acquired years ago circa 2012-2013 were made by Cheryl’s husband for their company CherryVape which sadly is no longer in business as far as I know. I believe CherryVape coined the name “Ming” as a style of the drip tip they made. It was of course a dynasty in China but it appears that this style was used in old Chinese smoking devices and also an ancient Asian pottery and glassware in the shape of a vase (see pics). Anyway, you get the idea.

Each one of these drip tips are lined with a steel tube. Some drip tips are still made this way. I do prefer the exclusion of metal but on the other hand this makes them more durable over time. CherryVape Mings are solid acrylic. I have many broken Mings that have to be used with a CherryVape adapter made especially for broken stem Mings they called the “Ming Bowl” 🙂

Cheryl sold her Ming tips for $10 each and also did special designs for the holidays. It appears that Brett sold his tips for anywhere from $25 to $65 each. Today, you can still get Ming style tips for as low as $1 and even less in volume, from several companies on the web but they are just not as good as the originals.

Another company that hand crafted Ming style and others was Siam Mods. I never did get to purchase one of these beauties back in the day, so I dont know much about them. I know they were expensive including shipping from Asia but just somehow never acquired five or six that I wanted.

Matchy Matchy with a Pulse. This one measure 45mm tall.